Tenacity of spirit

Dreams are better than reality, because dreams can always be changed when reality fails, f.e. laws of physics are a bit different than needed (haha).

Living in the Universe is not about a lifeform solving [words--culture.htm#solution] a never ending series of problems [words--culture.htm#] realized from its ever changing present (and personal) mindset. There is no need to worry about never perfecting [words--general.htm#] anything, as everything is already finished when it is set aside for doing something else.

Change the mind and a different perspective can reveal another understanding of the moment, perhaps even appreciation. Every lifeform dies, and whatever mindsets a lifeform had before death no longer has that lifeform as a host. As such, the experience is what matters, how everything gets along and fits for now, as there might be no later.

Therefore, there is no need to change the world, it is always changing on its own. Archeologists of the future will fail to know what has happened, as they always have failed before. There is no saving the world, only that of saving the way we are living; and "saving" always means "stopping change" and that would be the end of the world itself.

With that said...

It seems like to me all of my pursuits [pursuit.htm] (even the unlikely pursuits) are different beginnings for the same direction (not to be confused with a goal or endpoint): personalized computing.

Perhaps incredibly, the intent is to enable every person without the need for anyone to be a computer programmer. Of course, computer programmers would benefit, too, from the ease and the personal opportunities.

As such, I am pursuing having the computer repeat the keystrokes, pointer movements, and any other button presses for the current workflow involving whatever computer program system-wide that I might be using. Though my notes are incomplete, they could help me (or others) with getting started again.

New opportunities are like having elevators instead of having only stairs, f.e. the package delivery services with carts that would be encumbered by stairs if there were no elevator. Think of how anyone uses an elevator instead of stairs regardless of personal physical ability, and without feeling stigmatized for not using the stairs. Convenience and with no shame, and everybody benefits without needing specialized engineering knowledge or personal ability.

A recorded sequence of buttons would be likely a short length of text (f.e. button names like "a" or "Control-c") that can actually perform the work rather than recording a video requiring lots of computer memory and telegramming bandwidth. For example, completing a difficult part of a game for someone, perhaps requiring fingers that person has lost, or that has been permanently injured. Or, accomplish a task so tediously repetitive that it might never have been attempted without such automation.

It is especially about time for considering the importance of the temporary moments of disability (f.e. no-sight phone call, or temporarily single-handed) experienced by the TAB (temporarily able-bodied). Such considerations aids in addressing similar permanent disabilities.

In other words, there must be some new curiosity, some interests beyond the stories sold by the "computerized appliance" market. Beyond an all-in-one computer, beyond a personal digital assitant (PDA or "phone") as they are presently known.

Especially more introspection of what is being handled by the hardware: memory management (data and info) and process management (list of computer instructions).