Summary: In essence, the "you" is also "me", so no point anybody other than me (and only "now me", not "later me") taking anything personally that I wrote. Besides, this is the computer medium, so just save-and-edit any doc with new phrasing for yourself, as that is what I do, too.
Just a reminder (to myself, whomever I become) that you are responsible for (thereby you have the power over) your expectations you bring with you and your recall of your personal experiences, and when you are applying them while interpreting the voicing of writings and comprehending writings. This is why each person has a different perspective from each other, and why a person will have a different perspective before and after a change in perceptions.
Ultimately, you are the only one who can change your mind.
The mindset I typically have in person (or intend as my self-expression):
Therefore, here are some considerations to have in mind when reading (or listening to) anything I am sharing (written or spoken). [ Or from anyone else for that matter... ]
Rather than voicing anything in this document as "invective", maybe consider "dismay" or "disappointment" or "disheartened".
On the other hand, try out a "matter of fact" voicing, t.i. a neutral relating of information (regardless of actually verity). I generally have no interest in evoking emotions from other people, as I grew up trying to avoid the physical communication that often resulted from others with emotional bomb buttons or emotional bomb triggers.
Rather than interpreting as "blaming someone", consider "observation of an event" or "interpretation of a result".
Rather than conflate a role as being an actual person (t.i. stereotyping, like in journalism), consider a role as a position or location that is stepped into and out of on occasion by anyone.
It has been said by some that no one hates anyone, it is just what someone did that is hated. But, another way of considering that is: no one is ever hated, it is just whatever disruption has happened seems uninteresting as an opportunity.
[ Anita Moorjani ]The way I see it, if we were encouraged to express who we truly are, we'd all be very loving beings, each bringing our uniqueness to the world. Problems and strife come as a result of our not knowing who we are and not being able to show our inner beauty. We've created so much judgement about what's "perfect", which leads to doubt and competitiveness. Since we feel as though we're not good enough, we go around acting out. However, if each of us became aware of our magnificence and felt good about ourselves, it seems to me the only thing we'd have to share is our unique nature, expressed outwardly in a loving manner that reflects our self-care.
It follows that the problems we see in the world aren't from the judgment or hatred we have for others but for ourselves. Just as the key to my healing was unconditional self-love that eliminated fear, the key to a better world is for everyone to care for themselves [that] same way, realizing their true worth. If we stopped judging ourselves, we'd automatically find less and less need to condemn others. We'd begin to notice their true perfection. The universe is contained within us, and what we experience externally is only a reflection.
—Chapter 16: Infinite selves and universal energy. Dying to be me: my journey from cancer, to near death, to true healing. Anita Moorjani. 2012. Pages 148-149.
A stereotype is conceptual, perhaps an inspiration for a role, but nobody is a stereotype. That is taught in elementary school, the first half of public education, as every adult might recall.
For example, either "computer programmer" or "everyday person" reference a vague set of expectations about knowledge and responsibilities.
Any perceived (t.i. implied) dissatisfaction with a role, program, company, organization, government, or other set of concepts has nothing to do with any specific person. In other words, the set of concepts or expectations are likely unsatisfactory, never the person breathing life into them.
Much of the writing is quick or very concise notes gradually recorded over a long, long period of time. As such, the voicing varys greatly for different sections, even for immediate paragraphs. Mostly a reference or reminder of concepts, ideas, perspectives, and perhaps especially contrary of common expectations, hence their importance.